Artworks by the artist VincentCC
http://vincentmcart.blogspot.com

Updated till 2016.07.20

It's too bad his understanding of anatomy is so godawful. His technique, coloring, and style are pretty decent all around, and have shown steady signs of improvement, but his mastery of anatomy is still at the same amateurish level as when I first found his HF page like two years ago.

Base +6, Seelenmord +10, unknownshadows +4, Firuz +18, Limited -7, fletchlives -8, dyveira +7, hooza +6, thomas1850 -6, Mapleine -4, Ugly Ameoba +6, DanteDevil666 +3

VincentCC is actually a 26 year old female.. :p

Base +9, unknownshadows +4, fernendoff +7, dyveira -7, thomas1850 +6, rexxrexrex +10, Mapleine +4, Velmix +3, 410billionbluntz +5

Irrelevant to the actual point of what @diebesgrab was saying, @version 365...

Base +4, Firuz +18, Jago Smith +6, onlyregistere +12, lostlegoman +8, dyveira +7, Mapleine -4, DanteDevil666 +3

I don't get why people criticize her art so much. She has a unique presentation that is distinct and noteworthy. Actually the illustrations featuring a girl with a sidecut refelct the artist's real life appearance.

Base +6, Limited +7, dyveira -7, Mapleine +4, Ugly Ameoba +6, 410billionbluntz +5

I think the artstyle is EXCELLENT, however there's too much futa material for me to take much interest in perhaps 80% of what's here, so the good gets outweighed by material I don't really care for... Futa on female is fine for me, but futa on futa/futa on male/male on futa just doesn't take my interest most of the time.

Base +4, thomas1850 +6, Ugly Ameoba +6

These trolls that trash everybody have no class or friends.

Base +6, thomas1850 +6, Mapleine +4, 410billionbluntz +5

tm的辣眼睛！去死吧！

Base +2, kmplayer0 -13, Lloyd0 -6, wugch -6

Seriously I can't take this guy/gal/thing serious who tries to pretend ot be a critic here.

Sure Vianca's older work showed some flaws on the characters when it came to finger proportions and limb cohesiveness. Guess why. Woopdy fucking due those were based on the client's real life pictures. Real life pictures of people who have no perfect bodies with borked up fingers. Who are you to judge them for asking for art with themselves in it? You little prick. It is so adorable to see kids coming fresh out of their first year in college and they think they can criticize commissioned work after they learned what it means to draw a straight line on a perfect body.
Vianca's anatomy is more than properly done. Including mucles display, tendons depending on whether or not a muscles is flexed or not. Soft body parts following the general rules of gravity. Bones and the skeleton in general being revealed and sticking out against skin on depending on the position of the characters. Both on male and female characters.

My impression is that our wannabe critics here hate on her work because they either dislike the fact that she does work with some non-realistic fetishes and some not perfect looking clients who want to have themselves impersonated in her art.
Or they simply have no idea how those kinks work - which makes them simply unfit to criticize art with those kinks in it. She has a lot of hyper in her art. Of course hyper is not relaistic. I mean seriously someone who criticizes hyper art for the lack of realism in it is simply just a philistine idiot with little to no life experience.
Maybe the person in question criticizes her because she also has commission work for gay art in her gallery? Is this critic based on homo-phobia? Who knows?

Last but not least. I will repeat this. She is a commission artist. She has to follow the rules of whatever her clients want to. If they want gravity defying boobs that are three times bigger than the head of a female and foot long cocks that require more blood in them than an average body even has - they will get them. Are those realistic? Obviously not. But to claim that her anatomy is 'amateurish' is just ridiculous.

Base +9, Mapleine +4, Vass -6, Ugly Ameoba +6, DanteDevil666 -3