Direct downloads at https://anonscans.wordpress.com/
Also open to requests for future projects.

>that essay by the translator at the end

Base +6, blsboner +8, king or kami +6, thatfuckingduck +6, Genki for Life +5, TheQuasar +5, JimmyG17 +4, shanyc +4, poopyface +6, aspct +8, tazmanian devil +26, OTAKU_UNLMTD +5, ToxicCake +8, and 8 more...

Anti... Anticrack-kun? Is that you?

Base +8, MaartenAr +4, tomoki18 +6, TheQuasar +5, JimmyG17 +4, Krugger +6, ffxxffxx +2, shanyc +4, poopyface +6, MrDanger +5, @43883 +34, Amalthea +9, Mantama +8, and 2 more...

I'm not entirely sure why he thinks five paragraphs of bitching about how evil and disrespectful it is to read pornography of underage fictional characters in non-canon pairings (as opposed to pornography of underage fictional characters in canon pairings, which is a wise and eminently moral decision that affords them nothing but the highest honor) would improve the experience.

But whatever. Madohomu is Madohomu is lovely. Thanks, anticrackfag! You've proven that if you took the time you spent writing inane tracts and put it into translation, you might be a respectable fellow instead of /u/'s favorite whipping boy.

Kindly keep doing that. The best way to make people love MadoHomu and KyouSaya and so forth over other pairings is to give them lots of material for it, not ramble on and on about those wicked degenerates who dare to imply that Kyouko might be cuter with Mami.

Base +6, demeaener5 +9, akaikem +6, flare79 -6, reculeor -9, Kukri +6, MaartenAr +4, archit +6, TheQuasar +5, Occisor -6, ffxxffxx +2, soupiewg +5, Person8 -7, and 12 more...

pg 8 should be "why didn't you say anything?" instead of "why did you say anything?"

Base +6, blsboner +8, Genki for Life +5, archit +6, TheQuasar +5, SPitts -9, Mantama +8

That note at the end was unnecessary and doesn't make sense. But the art is nice.

Base +2, Genki for Life +5, TheQuasar +5, Person8 +7, shanyc +4, SPitts -9, Kanris +6, Mantama +8, Estaog +5, Juggernaut Santa +29

Really? A 7 paragraph dissertation about ecchi, hentai and lesbian sex of cannon/not cannon pairs of characters?

Wow.
THIS
IS
EX-HENTAAAAAAIIIII

Base +7, king or kami +6, Genki for Life +5, archit +6, TheQuasar +5, Person8 +7, shanyc +4, poopyface +6, SPitts -9, Kanris +6, simplesimon32 +25, @43883 +34, 8055 +10, and 3 more...

Is there a way to get that last 'image' removed? It contributes nothing and doesn't function as a credit page, either.

Base +6, Genki for Life +5, reculeor -9, Kukri +6, TheQuasar +5, Occisor -6, ffxxffxx +2, soupiewg +5, Person8 +7, shanyc +4, poopyface +6, SPitts -9, Paimonia -9, and 9 more...

tl;dr a normal credits page with a good kyousaya pic would have been better i think
oh well, time to go back to my blasphemous and degrading alternative pairings

Base +7, TheQuasar +5, Person8 +7, SPitts -9, Kanris +6, @43883 +34, MrDanger +5, Mantama +8, Inuyan +6, Juggernaut Santa +29

OK I usually don't comment but... was that rant in credit page necessary? Or do you really think it might change anything, that it even matters? That someone will take it seriously?
That someone cares?
I don't think so.

Base +6, SPitts -9, Paimonia -9, Kanris +6, Terbal +10, @43883 +35, Inuyan +6, Mantama +9, Juggernaut Santa +29

These characters were created for amusement and for profit therefore there is no correct or right way of treatment, after all these characters are not living human beings which means "they" have no right applicable on real human being. There is no right or wrong way of treatment.
Creators of the show gave us toys and it's up to us what we will do with them, with certain limitations of not using them to make profit and all that is against licensing policy of rights' owner.

Base +6, Red of EHCOVE +50, SPitts -9, Kanris +6, tazmanian devil +26, @43883 +34, MrDanger +5, smurf123 +25, Mrsuperhappy +21, Mantama +8, Sh@doW +6, Juggernaut Santa +29

Melonbooks - https://www.melonbooks.co.jp/detail/detail.php?product_id=119721

Pixiv - http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=48128351

Base +33, Red of EHCOVE +50, poopyface +6, Kanris +6, simplesimon32 +25, @43883 +35, Inuyan +6

Reminder that posting from two different accounts doesn't make you two different people.

Base +6, akaikem +6, Kukri +6, SPitts -9, Paimonia -9, Kanris +6, MrDanger +5, Mrsuperhappy +12, @43883 +35, Mantama +8, Inuyan +6, Juggernaut Santa +29

@-anon-

Even if we take you at face value that non-canon pairings "degrade" the characters involved, how does that cause any harm? They're fictional. I don't think most creators really care about non-canon pairings, as long as fans don't try to sell it or insist "it's totally canon, guys!" To them it's just the fans having fun with their work. In other circumstances, how could this character behave? How would the dynamics work between this character and this character? What are the motivational forces that drive characterization in one direction or the other? It's all writing exercises, albeit ones you say degrade the characters involved.

I'm sure metafiction authors actually love seeing non-canon, since their work is all about how characters and stories work.

Base +6, Red of EHCOVE +50, Kanris +6, MrDanger +5, smurf123 -25, Mantama +8, Inuyan +6, Juggernaut Santa +29, Orion9137 +11

@-anon-

In the case of blasphemy is causing hurt to the worshippers of a god and disrespect to a nation you're causing hurt to its citizens. Regardless, disrespect is not necessarily a negative action. I make jokes about the gods every day, and Jesus/Allah/Buddha help me if someone complains about something short of "[insert religion(s) here] is bad and wrong".

Regardless, I don't see how it speaks badly of me to ship, for fun, two characters while acknowledging that the canon relationship is the true one. I am not insulting the feelings of any character because they don't exist, and even if they were to, I am accepting that their strong feelings are canonical and that I'm just having fun. Just because dogs exist don't mean you can't write about a world without them. It doesn't insult the long, fruitful relationship between dogs and humanity to do so, nor the efforts of dog breeders from millennia till now to foster that relation.

Base +6, Red of EHCOVE +50, Kanris +6, MrDanger +5, smurf123 -25, Mantama +8, Inuyan +6, Juggernaut Santa +29, Orion9137 +11

@-anon-

At what point am I insulting someone? They are characters, little ideas on a screen and page meant to elicit emotions. They are not real, and have no actual feelings. It is disturbing how you cling so hard to the idea that we must be insulting fictional beings somehow. All human fiction is by its nature worthless, only imbued with worth from the viewers' and creators' interpretation of them. The circumstances and process of imbuing meaning is the entire point of literary and other creative theories, and there is no guarantee that the creators' intent is the final say. Communists and capitalists both read "The Communist Manifesto", but the latter searches outside of the meaning Marx intended for the work. There's an entire literary idea called "death of the author", where they are discarded, and as many other ideas between total death and total adherence to the author's intent as there are people.

If you cannot accept that we can disregard the creator's intent, then we must necessarily view all fiction exactly as intended. This is toxic to critical thought and dissent, and many creators even encourage people to challenge their intent or leave things ambiguous to allow the reader to make their own choices. That doesn't mean we don't acknowledge the creator's intent and canonicity, but that people have their own views on it and will discuss it.

If you insist that non-canon pairings are an abomination, then you are also insisting that we must read all the horrible fictions of the world exactly as how the creators intended. Are you really okay letting Twilight exist without any critique?

Base +6, Red of EHCOVE +50, poopyface +6, Kanris +6, MrDanger +5, smurf123 -25, Mantama +8, Inuyan +6, Juggernaut Santa +29, Orion9137 +11

So much energy and fire for a harmless non-h parody, when straight porn is swarmed with ooc garbage often catering to people not even fans of the source material.

Base +4, MrDanger +5, Inuyan +6, Sh@doW +6, Juggernaut Santa +29

Maybe people would be more sympathetic if this person wasn't crazy and didn't stalk people who disagree with them on IRCs.

Base +6, soupiewg +5, SPitts -9, Paimonia -9, Kanris +6, Mantama +8, Inuyan +6, Juggernaut Santa +29

Holy shit you idiots don't RESPOND to him. This guy is so obviously a crazy troll starved for attention that he belongs in an internet textbook. Post your witty one-liners about how crazy and pathetic he is, then ignore him. DO NOT ENGAGE. You're only feeding him if you do.

Base +6, soupiewg +5, SPitts -9, Paimonia -9, Kanris +6, simplesimon32 +25, @43883 +34, MrDanger +5, smurf123 +25, Mantama +9, Juggernaut Santa +29

@-anon-

My post on /u/ was stupid, looking back; I had slept very little.

Regardless, you are a strange man with strange ideas that make no sense. I'll continue shipping non-canon, because there is nothing morally wrong with it.

Lastly,

>An insult is both verb and noun, and what are confusing it with is "offence." Which is exclusively a noun, meaning someone must always posses it.

You have no idea what a noun actually IS, do you? A noun is simply a unit of speech that can occur as the subject of a clause (or object of verb/preposition). That's it. No one needs to own a noun. If you have a problem with that definition, then take it up with the linguists.

Base +6, SPitts -9, Kanris +6, MrDanger +5, Inuyan +6, Mantama +9, Juggernaut Santa +29

I think you guys should get back to fapping and save the kvetching for a different site.

Base +7, Kanris +6, aspct +8, MrDanger +5, Mantama +9, Juggernaut Santa +29

http://www.doujinshi.org/book/788245/

Base +34, @43883 +35

http://www.doujinshi.org/book/788245/

Base +27, @43883 +35, simplesimon32 +38

*reads doujin and accompanying dissertation*
*attempts to read above comments*

OH, THE IRONY!

P.S.- Oh, poor Nakazawa-kun!

. . .
. . . . . man, the TL must've stumbled upon a particularly nasty guro at some point.

Base +6, @43883 +35, Mantama +9, Juggernaut Santa +29

today is the day where curiosity killed the cat.

Base +32, Juggernaut Santa +29, @43883 +37, Shank +57, simplesimon32 +38