Note - Does NOT qualify for the "transformation" tag.

Why wouldn't it qualify?

Base +8, MikuJess +11, MaxMach +11

@versulas

Sudden changes do not count. See the tag definition.

Base +34, MikuJess -11, MaxMach -11, smile_spoot -6, DrunkSuika -7, zepher6 -5, shutizaki -6, Dartmuth -4, taj1994 -6, bobthebaco -4, gweh -27

I don't see why sudden changes should not be labeled as transformation.

Transformation cannot be labeled as such if it happens quickly? That doesn't make sense.

And considering how frivolously the gender bender tag gets thrown around, I don't see why transformation should be held to such tight standards.

Base +9, MaxMach +11, raspberrycake +7, sp0909 +7, DrunkSuika +7, taj1994 +6, lold +6, TheFlame234 +10, Lesamuen +9

It still takes three pages for them to go from two dudes to two furry herms. I'm not sure what's sudden about that.

Base +12, micnorian14 +9, DrunkSuika +7

3 panels out of 5 = 60% presence of transformation.
It counts under the tag definition.

"Sudden changes do not count (as in those that fail the presence rule)."
Presence rule: 10+ out of 80 images or more than 25% would be sufficient for tagging, more so if they are sequential.

This example: 3 pages in sequence in a 5 page gallery = 60%.
60% > 25%.

Base +6, zepher6 +5, Infernomancer +6, Dartmuth +4, taj1994 +6, gweh +27, Lesamuen +9

We have to buy more! lol That's some real stoner shit.

Base +7

@Maximum_Joe
1. It's a progressive change, not a sudden one
2. Sudden change still count.

Base +6